Monthly Archives: February 2009

My semester was going pretty swimmingly, and then Many Things happened. I will list them because I am sure you are interested in these things.

1. I started my Capstone research work, in earnest. This is the most important project of my academic career, and, as such, it gains top priority on this list. I’ll talk about this research in another post soon, once I have something I am ready to share!
2. My structured triathlon training is starting, like, now. This week is a recovery week (with a short race at the end), but after that starts the dreaded “base” period of my structured training, where volume is VERY high (like, 16/18/20 hours per week), intensity is very low (like, yawn) and motivation is low as well.
3. I got a bunch of projects in my two classes. Fortunately, the work in one class significantly overlaps my Capstone, but the work in my other class doesn’t have any direct overlap, so that sucks a bit.
4. I have a lot of grading to do for the class I teach. They just finished midterms today, and grading them takes an unusually long amount of time.
5. I’m working at my part-time job 16 hours/week. Monday and Wednesday are full days over at Ivy Tech doing tutoring. It’s actually okay–I can do homework while I’m there–but I get the feeling that the other tutors there are starting to resent the fact that I am generally burying my nose in my netbook whenever I’m there. I’m pretty sure I do a good job tutoring, but it’s just the vibe I’m getting I think.
6. My car is a piece of shit. Ever since I got it, I’ve had significant problems starting my car in the cold weather. I replaced the battery (again) this week, and hopefully that will do the trick, but I am skeptical as the battery it replaced was only two seasons old, and was a top-of-the-line battery. Maybe it was a dud, but who knows.
7. Lana is enjoying riding the tandem bicycle! While I always enjoy riding with Lana (on the tandem bicycle), it is another time commitment that I work into my schedule.
8. Of course, Lana and I have been watching 3-4 episodes of The Sopranos every night. Fortunately, we finished the series so hopefully now I’ll have more time for work. Great show, though. Definitely worth the slacking off that it took to watch it!
9. My bikes are all dirty and out of tune. They need to be fixed and cleaned. While I’m savvy enough to do this on the cheap, that basically means that I’m doing it myself. Which means time.
10. I have a bunch of stuff to sell on eBay. I already sold a pair of shoes but I still have a bunch of other crap. And since selling on eBay now sucks a lot of ass and is also time consuming I am not looking forward to it.

So, if I’m not updating my blog, Twitter, Facebook, or if I’m a little slow on the email uptake, well, there ya go!

Approximately one year ago, I purchased a 2008 Giant Trinity Alliance triathlon bike from Bikesmiths bike shop in Bloomington, IN. I’ve since put over 4000 miles on the bike.

I’ve noticed that not many people own Giant Trinity Alliance tri bikes. I’ve gotten many comments–through email, forums, facebook, the like–from perspective buyers asking me what I think of my bike, if I’d recommend it, etc. While I don’t mind answering these sorts of questions (please feel free to continue to ask me questions if you’re interested in the bike!), I’d like to put my thoughts on the bike together into one detailed review, in the hopes that this post will reach prospective Trinity Alliance bike buyers.

Bike fit: I ride a size Small, at 5′8″ 145lbs. The bike has a 78 degree seat angle, which is awesome. I ride at a virtual seat angle of about 82-83 degrees by tipping the end of my Tri Stryke saddle with the tip of the saddle 1cm in front of the BB.

The bike is an oddball in terms of fit–long and somewhat tall. Most bikes tend either to be “long and low” (like Cervelo’s bikes) or “short and tall” (like Scott’s bikes). The “long and low” bikes tend to fit men who like to ride in a steep position, and the “tall and short” bikes tend to fit men who like to ride more slack, and long-legged morphologies such as women and some tall men.

The “reach” (horizontal distance between BB and head tube top) of the bike is 41.0cm, which is very long for a bike of its size–comparable to a size M or 54 in many other bike brands. It has a “stack” (vertical distance between BB and head tube top) of 51.7cm, which is on the tall side for a bike of its size. For reference, it’s not as low as a 51cm P2/P3, but it’s a bit longer. It has about the same stack as a Scott Plasma in a size S (commonly considered a “tall” bike), but it’s a lot longer. In fact, you have to go to the Plasma size L to get a Plasma with the same reach as the Trinity Alliance in a size S! So, the Trinity Alliance is a very long bike in a size S, though the larger sizes correspond a bit better with the larger sizes in some other brands. (source: Slowtwitch.com)

In summary, the stack/reach, combined with the variable angle seat clamp, provides a wide fit range that should allow a large number of people to get a decent fit on the bike, provided that you can handle the length of the bike in the smaller sizes. However, if you like to ride very long/low, or very short/tall, you’ll probably find a better bike fit on a bike specifically designed for that purpose, which is *not* the Giant.

As an aside, in my case, due to my long forearms and aggressive riding position, I ride so long and low that I’d be using a slammed adjustable stem even on a Cervelo, so the extra stack on this bike ended up not being a huge factor for me. I am, however, personally very happy with the extra length that this bike provides.

Handling: The handling of the bike is one of its greatest features. The 72 degree head tube angle and ample trail on the fork provides a very stable ride in the aero position. I have no bike-related concerns barreling down the Bloomington rollers at 45mph. I have never had a speed wobble on this bike. The carbon fiber frame tubes (seat tube, top tube, chain stay) seem to do a good job of providing comfort on long rides. I’m not strong enough to make any statements about frame stiffness.

Other frame considerations: These, in my opinion, are generally where the bike’s weaknesses are. The aero-style tubing seems to do a good job, but it’s not as aero as some of the wind-tunnel tested frames for other manufacturers. The bike does look aero, though, and there is definitely something to be said for the “placebo” affect of a bike that looks fast. The seat tube is definitely more aero than a round tube, and the down tube is decently sharp and streamlined.

The head tube is not particularly aero, so I use a Jetstream aerobottle to (possibly) help with the front end aerodynamics. There are water bottle bosses on the down tube and seat tube, though on the size S I have difficulty making large-size water bottles fit–it’s a really tight squeeze. The dropouts are rearward and semi-horizontal, which is a pain in the ass. I don’t think that the derailleur hanger is replaceable–another pain in the ass. The seat clamp requires an open-ended wrench to manipulate–yet another pain in the ass. The seatpost clamp is a standard 5mm hex key bolt, with the proper torque printed clearly on the seatpost, and since it’s a carbon fiber-on-carbon fiber clamp, it’s very important to torque this bolt correctly. The top tube has a nice flat portion on top near the tt/ht junction, which I use to velcro pepper spray (training) or Vittoria Pit Stop (races) to the frame. The internal cable routing is good, though I haven’t personally worked on the cables yet (I’m replacing the cables next week).

Other thoughts: The wheels are heavy, but pretty good. No major problems with them in 4000 miles. They are not aero in the slightest. I replaced many stock components (Sora rear derailleur, cockpit, and others) almost immediately, and some (crankset, Sora front derailleur) over time. The stock components I rode on were fine. My current component set up is much better though! Ultegra 9spd is a great compromise for me right now, as it’s a lot cheaper than even 105 10spd, and I’m not any slower because I don’t have that extra gear in the back.

Overall recommendation: If you are the type of rider who needs a long bike, this should definitely be a bike on your list. If you need a shorter bike, you may find yourself using a lot of headset spacers on a smaller size bike in the Giant line, which is not ideal. In terms of price, the Giant is very competitive, and their new 2009 all-Aluminum Trinity (not Trinity Alliance) seems to be an excellent value. Handling is excellent, out-of-box components are good, attention to detail seems to be a weakness. For me personally, I would give this bike a very strong 8.5/10, with the bike losing points due to its slightly unusual sizing and some poor frame details, but gaining points for its incredible value and brilliant handling.

Marty on the Giant Trinity Alliance A2 Tri Bike

Appendix 1: Bike specs.

Frame: 2008 Giant Trinity Alliance (A2 paint scheme), still using.
Fork: 2008 Giant Trinity Alliance (A2 paint scheme), still using.
Headset: Giant, still using.
Wheels: Xero XSR-1, still using.
Training tires: Maxxis Re-Fuse with butyl tubes.
Race wheels: Vuelta Carbon Tubular, 50mm rim depth. Purchased in April, have put about 400 miles on them, mostly races.
Race tires: Vittoria Evo Corsa CX Tubular, blue color. Latex tubes.
Cassette: SRAM PG950 9spd 11-26 cassette (stock).
Handlebars: Nashbar base bar, Oval single bend extensions. Replaced stock handlebars (Vision) at 0 miles.
Shifters: Shimano Dura-Ace 9spd shifters. Replaced stock shifters (Shimano Dura-Ace 9spd) at 0 miles.
Brake levers: Tektro. Replaced stock brake levers (Dia Compe 188 ) at 0 miles.
Stem: Dimension Adjustable 115mm, slammed to -40 degrees. Replaced stock stem at 0 miles.
Saddle: Profile Tri Stryke. Replaced stock saddle (Giant stock) at 0 miles.
Crankset: Shimano Tiagra Compact 50-34. Replaced stock crankset (FSA Gossamer 53-39) at about 2500 miles.
Pedals: Shimano R540.
Chain: SRAM 9spd chain.
Bottom Bracket: Shimano Octalink. Replaced stock bottom bracket (?) at about 2500 miles.
Front Derailleur: Shimano Ultegra 9spd. Replaced stock FD (Sora 9spd) at about 3000 miles.
Rear Derailleur: Shimano Ultegra 9spd. Replaced stock RD (Sora 9spd) at 0 miles.
Brake Calipers: Stock calipers. Replaced brake pads at 4000 miles. Use carbon brake pads when using race wheels.

So I was swimming at the SRSC tonight, minding my own business, getting in a decent workout (though I was pretty tired from yesterday’s cycling). I hit 2000 yards exactly, when the lifeguard comes up to me and says, “excuse me, we are closing the pool now.”

I said, “oh, okay, sorry, I didn’t know–you guys are closing early tonight?”

“Yeah, well, we found some fecal matter in the pool, and we want to take every precaution that we can.”

It was as if all other thoughts in my head were instantly replaced with the “doody” scene in Caddyshack. I didn’t know that these things actually happen outside of hilariously awful B movies!

Lana and I were both in the market for a “netbook” (a teeny tiny laptop with minimal computing power but a very small and lightweight footprrint), and we had decided on the Acer Aspire One as our netbook of choice, owing to its sleek design, awesome keyboard (for its size) and low price.

In spite of that, we were both content to wait a while to drop the dough (though Lana was planning on getting hers sooner than I was, due to grad school being right around the corner for her). However, when tigerdirect.com randomly knocks $100 off the price of a computer that STARTS at $350, they’re basically begging us to buy them.

So we did.

We bought two identical Acer Aspire One netbooks (in the white color), and they arrived this afternoon. After a joyous unboxing ceremony–how often do you get to unbox TWO laptops at the same time!!–we set to work on getting them ready for use (removing bloatware, modifying desktop settings, installing our favorite programs, etc).

Here’s a link to pictures of my netbook (Lana was using hers so I didn’t get a chance to photograph it).

Specs-wise, the Acer Aspire One is nothing special–1.6Ghz Intel Atom processor, 1GB ram, 120GB hard drive, no optical drive, etc. This spec lineup was old hat four years ago. That’s the sacrifice with netbooks.

However, the 8.9″ screen which runs at a resolution of 1024×600 is not only perfectly usable, but beautiful and stunningly sharp. The keyboard, which is 89% of full size, is surprisingly easy to use–I’m writing this blog post on the Aspire One with no difficulties–and there are no goofy key placements. And, of course, it’s tiny–it could almost fit in a jacket pocket (if you had a very big jacket)!

The battery life is mediocre (2-2.5 hours with the provided 3-cell battery), but I ordered a 9-cell battery which should give me around 8-9 hours of battery life at the cost of about 12 ounces of extra weight.

All in all, it’s super lightweight at about 2 pounds, well-constructed and sleek looking. When my current larger laptop craps out in probably about 18-24 months, I’m going to purchase a much larger desktop-replacement laptop, and then this little guy will be my go-to machine for on-the-go-computing.

Awesome.